|
In the world of quantum
physics, everything is energy and energy is everything; therefore,
on some level, everything can be expressed in waveform. It is
this waveform data through which the Remote Viewer becomes aware of
or perceives information during the Remote Viewing session; the
period during which data relevant to the distant target is
acquired. It is this waveform expression of the target and
all of its components that the Viewer perceives, and then records
in the form of visual data (contour sketches and detailed
renderings), and verbal data (using language to express color,
texture, temperature, taste, sound, smell, energetic data,
dimensional data, aesthetic data, emotional data, tangible data,
intangible data, and other elements of information depending on the
length of the session and the intention of the Viewing
session.
The more you study and
understand the quantum perspective of the universe in which we
exist, the more you will understand and perfect your ability to
Remote View. To say that you are the instrument in Remote
Viewing is a correct statement; detecting and decoding waveform
data relies on this instrument aspect of the Viewer; more on this
in a moment. However, to let it stand at that, is accepting a
self-imposed limitation to ones potential. It is like a
beginning javelin thrower being told by a coach, You are the
propellant; just throw it in this direction. The finest
javelin throwers in the world; the Olympians, make it a point to
understand everything about their art; for them it becomes a
science. They study aerodynamics, trajectory, nutrition,
conditioning, altered states (the zone in sports), psychological
warfare, positioning, and hundreds of other variables that allow
them to dominate the competition and fly their javelins to new
records in distance. Remote Viewing is no different, and to
imply that is, smacks of an ignorance of educational analysis and
training methodology.
To anchor yourself as a Remote Viewer, to
absorb the protocols and their meaning, to establish a program of improvement,
to set training goals and adhere to training standards, requires your
understanding of the science of the quantum world. Further, those who seek
to truly excel in this art and science will work diligently to understand the
biology of the brain; the physiology of the body; the power of intention, how to
achieve and sustain an altered state, how to analyze training progress, and
again, there will be hundreds of other variables which one can monitor and
master in an effort to develop as a Remote Viewer. Ignore these requirements
and you relegate your interest in Remote Viewing to simply that, an interest.
It will be nothing more than a stroke of a subtle curiosity, a dalliance, an
entertainment, side show act or hobby. There is nothing wrong with this if
this is all you desire; unfortunately, many individuals really want to be good
at this, yet they are led to believe that you are the
instrument and this is all you can expect and this is fundamentally
juxtaposed to progressive learning.
In the protocols of Remote
Viewing, detecting and decoding waveform data is the fundamental
methodology. This may sound like something very odd, yet you
are doing it constantly, you are in fact doing it right now.
Virtually every instant of your waking life is filled with the
almost unconscious metronomic activity of detecting and decoding
four-dimensional waveform data, and decoding it into coherent
three-dimensional thought form. Before I go any further, let
me say that the four-dimensions of which I am referring are defined
by three spatial dimensions of height, width and depth, and the
fourth dimension is a temporal one that of time.
Lets look at a relatively
simple example. You are reading this description, either from
a printed page, or from a computer monitor. Light waves (not
to get into the classic argument as to exactly how light travels let
us agree it will be in waveform for this explanation) are moving
from the monitor or the printed page to your eye. These
instruments called eyes, perform a critical function of detecting
the light waves and transforming this waveform data into
electro-chemical responses that are sent to the biological
brain. The brain detects these signals and decodes them into
coherent three-dimensional thought form. Put another way,
your brain recognizes the various patterns of ink on the page that
constitute the letters in the written words of the language you
comprehend. The decoding process in this example only works
if you understand the language, this is the only way it can be
coherent. Your appreciation of the words in the decoding
process is then linked to your experience rolodex; all that you
have previously read about, witnessed, experienced, et
cetera. For example, when a child reads the word death, it is
likely that the child will have no experience or reference to death
and therefore the word, the decoded data means little or nothing.
However, if the child has experienced the death of something,
lets say a pet or a member of the family, the child will
physiologically respond when reading the word death. The
decoding process will ignite a subjective response in the child
that can span a wide variety of objectification. The child
may cry, stop reading, or reflect on the loss or on some pre-event
(death) occurrence. If the child speaks about the word death,
or how the word makes him or her feel, this is called a verbal
objectification, and the decoding process is considered complete
for this example.
If an artist looks across a
landscape, a similar process to your reading of this page is taking
place. The difference is the artist in engaged in the art and
science of detecting the light waves and decoding them into
coherent thought form. The completion of the decoding process
involves the objectification in two-dimensional medium, i.e.,
placing paint on a two-dimensional canvas, or dragging a pencil
across a two-dimensional piece of paper. If the artist were
to close the eyes, would the imagery stop? The answer is
no. At first there would be what is called persistence of
vision, the electro-chemical data flow to the brain from the
imagery still impacting the retina of the eye. The older you
are, the longer it takes for this to dissipate. However, once
it subsides, is there more data available to the artist? Yes,
there is. If the artist and canvas were taken inside, where
the landscape could no longer be seen, could the artist still
paint? The answer is again, yes. Would it be
accurate? That depends on a number of conditions; the state
of the instrument (the brain), anxiety levels, analytical processes
or ability to reconstruct from memory, and other variables.
On the other hand, if the artist can relax, if the artist can
forget the name of what it is that he is looking at, if the artist
can let go and just begin detecting the waveform expression of the
landscape, with eyes closed or open, he can begin decoding the data
into three-dimensional thought form, and continue the
objectification process by finishing the painting this is a loose
example of Remote Viewing.
What about hearing? Is
that detecting and decoding four-dimensional waveform data?
Is that data decoded into coherent three-dimensional thought
form, and can this thought form be objectified into two-dimensional
medium? Of course it can. Sound travels in waveform
across three dimensions of space with an element of time inherently
applied; you are aware of the speed of sound, just as you are aware
of the speed of light. The instruments again, this time ears,
transform the waveform data into electro-chemical responses or
signals that are sent to the brain. The brain decodes the
signals into coherent three-dimensional thought form, or spoken
language, subsequently, which one can identify with. If you
do not speak the language you are hearing, then the brain decodes
the signals into what would be considered simply, sound. If
the listener understands the language and is making notes on what
they are hearing, then this is an example of objectification into
two-dimensional medium, and the process is again complete.
Detecting, decoding, objectifying. Detecting four-dimensional
waveform data, decoding it into coherent three-dimensional thought
form (in this case language, sound, music, et cetera.), and
objectifying by writing on paper what is heard.
To explore another Remote
Viewing example, let us say I ask you to close your eyes, and I
prompt you to go to a beach in your mind; a beach you have visited
before. I can ask you to see the beach, smell the beach, hear
it, and even taste it. I can direct you to explore the
temperature of the water, the heat of the sun on your flesh, the
texture of the sand beneath your feet, and all of this sensory
information would be available to you. You can smell the salt
air; feel the cool water and the thermal energy of the sun.
All of this sensory data is coming from what; your
imagination? You are not physically at the beach, so where is
the data stream coming from? If you decide it is imagination,
then what is the origin of imagination? Where does imaginary
data come from; what constitutes imagination? Is this recall,
is it a fabrication, or is it detecting and decoding waveform data
that is relevant to the actual beach distant in
space-time?
In fact, your ability to do
this will rely upon all of these elements. You will produce a
certain amount of data from recall; remembering the last time you
where there by sparking the neural network of the brain, prompting
it to release sub elements of data embedded holographically in the
neurons and glial cells of the biological brain and beyond.
You will fabricate a certain amount of the data; a construction of
sensory data that will be as unique to the scenario as you
are. And, there will be elements of data that match the beach
in real-time, people on the beach right now, the weather
conditions, smells, tastes, activity, emotions and a the like as
they exist right now on planet earth. The difficulty is that
you will not be satisfied with this answer, you will want to know
what is recall, what is fabricated and what is real, or in the
lexicon of Remote Viewing was it raw viewing data.
Well, this is what you will
learn in class; how to use the dogma of the Remote Viewing
protocols to detect four-dimensional waveform data relevant to a
target distant in space-time; to decode this data into coherent
three-dimensional thought form; and to objectify this data into
two-dimensional medium in the form of visual and verbal sensory
data. You will sketch the contours of the target, the
textures and dimensions of the target. Further, you will be
trained to decode and objectify verbal sensory data, by describing
and listing the colors, temperatures, smells, tastes, sounds,
including verbal descriptors of energy and dimension as well as
texture. As you move deeper into the protocols you will be
trained to detect and decode aesthetic data, emotional data,
tangible elements of data and intangible elements of data. As
you reach the end of the basic training protocols you will be
trained to assemble your visual perceptions into detailed sketches
of the distant target called renderings. You will be trained
to use your verbal data to complete these renderings, too fill in
the blanks; to use verbal data to prompt visual data and use visual
data to prompt descriptors and supporting verbal data. You
will do all of this over a period of ninety-minutes, producing
anywhere from forty-five to sixty-five pages of verbal and visual
data. You will do this without ever being told what the
target is before or during your exercise; and you will produce on
average, thirty-five to forty percent accurate and useable data.
And, if you practice, if you study this art form and this
science, you will only improve.
So what does this do for
me? Well, that is another question, and the answer to that
question will take another ten pages. Suffice it to say that
in this existence, we all believe in something. All of us
there are no exceptions to this rule; we all believe in
something. Even if we believe in nothing, we believe
in something. The human quest in this existence is for
knowledge; we are on an eternal quest for knowledge that honors a
timeless path toward wisdom. Each of us measures the
attainment of this grail in our own way; some measure it in
financial abundance, some in spiritual awareness, others in
personal power, others in quality of life, and the list goes
on. You may measure the story of your life, the purpose of
this existence in any way you desire but think of how different
would this life be, if you knew you are more than the physical, and
that you have access to the waveform expression of all life, of all
thoughts, of all things in the matrix field of all
dimensions? How different would your life be, if you could
see around the corner of time, just to the other side of the
moment? How would you look at the person you love if you knew
they were eternal, as are you? How would you guide your
business if you could see beyond the surfaces of the competition,
into their thoughts, their intentions? How would you guide
your children in this existence if you knew that they were going to
be responsible for ushering the human condition out of the next
destructive phase of the global society, or into the next
rebuilding phase of the global society? How different would
your life be, if you knew that all you have to do is close your
eyes and look through the darkness, through the event horizon of
time to see the next great breakthrough in medicine, education,
technology, science and so forth?
Believing is easy, it requires little from
us in the long run. Because the belief is conceptual, it routinely alters
itself, morphing from this to that based on superficial needs and desires.
Beliefs are conveniences that can only become knowledge through the experience
of doing, in the physical and the nonphysical existence. If you want to know more; if you are ready to move from believing to
knowing, then Remote Viewing is for you. The ability is not
unique to me or any other former military trained Remote Viewers,
we all have it, we all have the ability. You have
always had it, through every breath, every blink of the eye you
have been connected to something greater than yourself; your
conditioning has taught you to believe in the possibility of this,
but to doubt it could ever exist within you. Your conditioning has
told you to doubt yourself and in this doubt to stop listening to
the still small voice inside. Remote Viewing is simply a
manifest protocol designed to offer you irrefutable and undeniable
evidence that you can see distant in space-time with a variable yet
increasing degree of accuracy. This evidence is what
transforms your belief into awareness, a knowledge offering you a
new perspective on a life filled with promise and
possibility.
|